" /> storytelling: October 12, 2006 Archives

« October 11, 2006 | Main | October 13, 2006 »

October 12, 2006

She *did* make the stuff up

Here's another bit about counterfeiting, specifically about a woman who was really good at it. Also via Wikipedia, a short history of Mary Butterworth who, as far as I know, has not yet been the subject of any historical fiction treatment... in case anybody out there is looking for an idea:

Born to Joseph and Elizabeth (Smith) Peck in Rehoboth, Massachusetts, she married John Butterworth, son of a British captain in 1710. Mary Butterworth allegedly started her counterfeiting operation around 1716. According to those who would later testify against her, Butterworth used starched cotton cloths to produce counterfeit bills, rather than the metal plates used more commonly in counterfeiting. With a hot iron, she transferred a pattern from the cloth to a blank paper bill, then inked the pattern by hand with quill pens. The original cotton cloth was easily disposed of through burning, leaving no hard evidence of a crime. Butterworth allegedly organized her counterfeiting operation into a cottage industry, sternly overseeing the work of the entire family. At the height of her operation, she was reportedly selling counterfeit bills at half their face value.

Colonial authorities knew of an extensive counterfeiting ring operating somewhere in the Rhode Island area throughout the later half of the 1710s, and felt it was beginning to have a damaging impact on the entire colonial economy. In 1722 colonial authorities became suspicious of Mary Butterworth after her husband John purchased a large, expensive new home for the family.

On August 14, 1723 a trial was held in Newport, Rhode Island. One Nicholas Campe testified he passed two counterfeit Rhode Island bills he obtained through Butterworth. Two of Butterworth's associates (her brother and his wife) turned state's evidence and also testified against her. Ultimately though, the court dismissed all charges against her for lack of hard evidence.

After the trial, Butterworth reportedly gave up counterfeiting. She died in 1775 in Bristol County, Massachusetts.

You can't make this stuff up.

You want to write historical fiction, all you have to do is read history. I was doing a bit of research on counterfeiting and I came across this tidbit on Wikipedia:

In 1926 a high-profile counterfeit scandal came to light in Hungary, when several people were arrested in the Netherlands while attempting to procure 10 million francs worth of fake French 1000-franc bills which had been produced in Hungary; after 3 years, the state-sponsored industrial scale counterfeit operation had finally collapsed. The League of Nations' investigation found Hungary's motives were to avenge its post-WWI territorial losses (blamed on Georges Clemenceau) and to use profits from the counterfeiting business to boost a militarist, border-revisionist ideology. Germany and Austria had an active role in the conspiracy, which required special machinery. The quality of fake bills was still substandard however, due to France's use of exotic raw paper material imported from its colonies.

I find this intriguing. Substitute names of kids for names of countries and it sounds like a squabble on the playground. Hungary (Jimmy) is mad at Peter (France) because Peter beat him up and took a lot of his stuff. Marty (Germany) and Moe (Austria) hate Peter too, so when Jimmy tells them about this plan he's got to get even, they volunteer to help. See, they're going to fool Peter into thinking he's got like, more money in his pocket than anybody else by putting pebbles in his there when he's not looking. While Peter is busy bragging about all his money Jimmy's going to sneak in and steal back the stuff Peter took from him. And maybe some stuff for Marty and Moe, too. But then Jimmy gets cocky and he overdoes it, puts too many pebbles in Peter's pocket so his pants fall down, the pocket rips and everything falls out, and then the jig is up.

Maybe all wars could be recast this way. Maybe it's all about pulling the other guy's pants down and running off with his stuff. And of course, killing people.

There was another case history which really, if you used it in a historical novel you'd have some trouble because the average person would declare it unlikely. I'll post that later.

PS I am feeling a lot better, than you for your kind words. And also about the beauteous Girlchild who indeed doesn't believe she's anything to look at all, and hates her glorious hair.

Oh and: tomorrow, the announcement of the winner of the rewrite this! contest.

an early peek (listen): Queen of Swords

For anybody who is within striking distance of Bellingham Washington on beautiful Bellingham Bay overlooking the San Juan Islands and the glaciers on Mount Baker (yes, it really is that good)...

I'm reading from Queen of Swords (and signing copies) at Village Books on Tuesday, October 24, at 7:30 pm. Which is, I must point out, before the official release date.

And: about four more hours to get your rewrite this! entry in to win a signed copy.

And: apropos of nothing, but here's the Girlchild at three....

And here's the Girlchild's senior portrait:

quote of the day

What is the Internet, if not the world's most efficient way to say something bad about someone -- and post pictures of cats?

from Whatever.