" /> storytelling: April 13, 2005 Archives

« April 12, 2005 | Main | April 17, 2005 »

April 13, 2005

venn diagrams, and commentary progress

The comment function should be working now; however, if you run into an error message, please email me, okay? Because that's the only way I know that something's off. In the meantime, this comment from Robyn on my Auden-esque ramble:

I've decided that my qualifiers for a Great Read (one worthy of shelf space and re-reading and pressing on to others) is, it: made me laugh, made me cry, got me sexually or sensually involved, made me think, and had at least one compelling character who CHANGED or LEARNED and whom I still cared about some time after I had closed the book. For bonus points, or if one of these areas was weak or neglected, having been surprised in a satisfied manner (or satisfied in a way I didn't see coming).

If it made me see something in a new way, or had a few words that stuck in my head that I had to copy down to read again, that's extra points, too.

If I can't muster that much critical energy, then the fast, economy test for me is a two-pronged question -- Did it keep me in a trance? (judged by, lost track of time, lost track of where I was, wasn't bothered by bodily signals) and, When I came out of the trance, was I glad I had read it? (vs. embarassed, ashamed, cheated of the time, made slightly worse as a person, etc.)

So, interesting -- I, the consumer, judge a read by the effects it has on me. You, the pro, (pro-ducer and pro-fessional) describe it in terms of its structure, prose, etc.

I love your illustration, btw. Putting things in their proper spot on a Venn diagram always makes me feel that the world is in a teeny bit better order [g]

Now see, this is why I need input. Because Robyn's qualitative questions work in a way that my venn diagram does not. I suppose my approach has some merits, but it doesn't get to the heart of the matter, basically Robyn's two-pronged question:
Did it keep me in a trance? (judged by, lost track of time, lost track of where I was, wasn't bothered by bodily signals) and, When I came out of the trance, was I glad I had read it? (vs. embarassed, ashamed, cheated of the time, made slightly worse as a person, etc.)
I'm not sure where the compulsion comes from to quantify something so objective and personal as a story. Maybe my academic training; maybe the fact that my right and left brains are always in a struggle for the upperhand. Maybe because it's what I do for a living, and as Robyn says, it just gives me a feeling of having some kind of understanding or control over a process that is opaque by its very nature.

Off to write.