That-Which-Shall-Not-Be-Spoken-Of : more sex!!!
Yoyotan (the person who wrote this LiveJournal entry) doesn't like it when people use words like cock and fuck in writing sex scenes. He makes a strong statement about it. I find this interesting because I was just posting, a few days ago, about my own hesitation to use the word cock, why I chose to use it, and how that particular word is borderline taboo in the same way that the image of male frontal nudity is borderline taboo in film. In the LJ thread somebody touched on this same idea by coining "That-Which-Shall-Not-Be-Spoken-Of." I sense a new word game on the horizon.
Yoyotan's post got a big response. For example to this statement
I'm sorry if anyone feels insulted.Ladybirdsleeps replied
Well, then, it's probably a good idea not to call people actually like those words underage virgins who failed sex ed and don't know how to use a thesaurus. Because, yanno, that's kind of insulting.It's an interesting discussion, but you actually have to follow all the threads to get the full impact. There's a really odd bit where the anti-cock contingent seems to be claiming that a novel which dares to venture into the realm of That-Which-Shall-Not-Be-Spoken-Of can't get published.
> >I think it's great you're trying to get your novel published with all the venacular intact. If you succeed, I think that will be an amazing accomplishmentTo which the pro-cock caucus (sorry. who could resist?) responds
>> Are you familiar with, oh, off the top of my head, now: Irvine Welch? James Ellroy?My sense is that some people read very ... narrowly, but don't even realize it. Which makes this whole discussion not only amusing, but vaguely sad.