« bitches, rebels and other heroines | Main | absolutes »

April 20, 2004

non-negotiables

Another good question from Chris:
Are there qualites that HAVE to go into the making of an interesting "hero", regardless of sex, and are other qualities only needed/appreciated in either sex? And if so, what are they?
I'm going to have to think about this for a bit. If anybody else has a list of non-negotiable qualities for a protagonist regardless of sex, I'd sure like to hear them.

As far as qualities that I'd reserve for one sex over another, nothing comes to mind immediately except the physical dominance points I raised last week. Which doesn't mean you can't have a physically strong, very fit female protagonist -- that's one of the things I like about Aeryn Sun. It's even okay for her to get the better of John now and then in a wrestling match, at least temporarily. This is, of course, my personal preference as far as fictional characters go.

April 20, 2004 02:47 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.tiedtothetracks.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/90

Comments

to me it seems good to have at least one major flaw in a story hero. A handicap or curse that makes him unable to walk the "straight path". E.g. give a box champion the fear of killing someone, or give the perfect lover a limping leg....

Posted by: Rozzo at April 21, 2004 06:07 AM

I think a sense of humor is pretty essential. Not that the protagonist has to be wisecracking through his dialogue, but he should at least recognize things that are absurd.

Posted by: Stephanie at April 21, 2004 06:29 AM

How about a rock-solid moral core? The hero can (and probably must) have serious flaws and weaknesses, but some fundamental part of the character, even if deeply buried, needs to recognize right from wrong.

But then there's Patricia Highsmith's Ripley -- does he count as a hero?

Posted by: Karen Palmer at April 21, 2004 07:58 AM